Dealer dyno tune

[98fxstc]

Curious about this dyno chart
It is a Dealer tune on a 107 M8 after a cam install
compares the final calibration with the canned map

[attach=0]

I was looking for the Smoothing number in the top right corner
I can't believe how clean and smooth the lines are
the similarity of the lines  ?
Very interested in any comments
Thanks

[rigidthumper]

Lines are smooth because they're compressed- have them print your chart scaled to 0,120, instead of -60,120, it'll look more normal.
At WOT, they gained 4/4, so it's possible they used a very developed map, built based on previous similar/same builds, that just needed a small amount of tweaking, and lots of verification/adjustment runs through the RPM/TPS scale ( run 5 through run 56 ).

[rigidthumper]

Just for visual reference, here is the same runs, displayed two different ways:
[smg id=3370]

[98fxstc]

Thankyou Robin
I realized the scaling would smooth it out a bit, but still expected to see a few wiggles
I see from your example that is not necessarily true
I had looked at the number of runs
Time between run 5 and run 56 was 1 hour 40 mins (1 every 2 minutes ? )
Owner said his bike had an additional 50 kms (31.25 miles) on the odometer

[rigidthumper]

If he is using sweep tests, there are at least a dozen different throttle positions to measure/adjust, * 2 cylinders, so 50 runs aren't out of the realm of acceptable.

[98fxstc]

If he is using sweep tests, there are at least a dozen different throttle positions to measure/adjust, * 2 cylinders, so 50 runs aren't out of the realm of acceptable.

Thankyou

[Hilly13]

It doesn't seem to me that there is enough time to do all those runs and make adjustments, I'm not a tuner though so it's just my uneducated opinion really, results posted are ok, no AFR line, why do people use different layouts for the sheets?

[Ohio HD]

Just for visual reference, here is the same runs, displayed two different ways:
[smg id=3370]

   understand the actual values too, not just the shape.