Author Topic: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams  (Read 2184 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline joe_lyons

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5081
  • Country: us
  • Just another squirrel trying to get a nut.
    • Powerhouse Cycle & Dyno
2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« on: June 15, 2017, 06:08:24 AM »
« Last Edit: June 15, 2017, 06:15:25 AM by joe_lyons »
Powerhouse Cycle & Dyno - Performance is our passion
816-425-4901

Offline cherryseeg2

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 472
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2017, 06:34:48 AM »
 :up: :up: Looks good Joe.
2005 Cherry SEEG2-J&B Performance 120 163hp/144tq

Offline build it

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1642
  • Country: 00
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2017, 11:07:32 AM »
Nice deal
Not everything’s a nail.

Offline 1FSTRK

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 7644
  • Country: 00
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2017, 01:53:47 PM »
 :up: :up:
Nice job Joe
"Never hang on to a mistake just because you spent time or money making it."

Offline harpwrench

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 534
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2017, 03:48:24 PM »
That's my bike, and I'm very pleased with John's tuning on the heads and Joe's tuning on the ECM as well as taking care of the wrenching.   :beer: :beer:
It runs really smooth and quiet.
« Last Edit: June 15, 2017, 04:11:57 PM by harpwrench »

Offline 98fxstc

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1095
  • Country: au
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2017, 05:28:57 PM »
Good job Joe  :up:
Are you liking the TTS ?

Offline Yo_Boss

  • Member
  • Posts: 49
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2017, 05:21:01 AM »
Wow great job! That's a lot of HP out of a 103 what is your compression?

Offline harpwrench

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 534
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2017, 06:49:45 AM »
10.4

Offline No Cents

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 7963
  • Country: us
  • there is no cure for what I got !
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #8 on: June 16, 2017, 07:53:09 AM »
 nice job!  :up:
excellent gains.
08 FLHX my grocery getter, 124ci, wfolarry 110" heads, Burns pipe, 158/152 sae

Online sfmichael

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5362
  • Country: us
  • Hoping to build the next mighty 'mouse'
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #9 on: June 18, 2017, 09:25:23 PM »
outstanding 103 numbers - congrats to all  :up: :up: :up:
Colorado Springs, CO.

Offline Raleigh111

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 284
  • Country: us
  • live today! you could be gone tomorrow.
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #10 on: June 20, 2017, 04:28:34 AM »
nice job. seems people keep pushing that cam higher up the squeeze ladder. 10,4?
Harleys are addicting and im out of money. Accepting donations! 120 132hp 146tq

Offline Durwood

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4159
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #11 on: June 20, 2017, 04:45:12 AM »
nice job. seems people keep pushing that cam higher up the squeeze ladder. 10,4?
I put a set S&S 570 cams in a 120R Trike, talk about a torque monster compared to the throttle response with the 266e cam set.

Look's great Joe and John :up:

There is allot to be said about a blueprinted build, even just the top end, zero deck, setting the net squish accordingly, then a proper tune.

Some guys don't take the time, but I am of the opinion that if you are there, why not?.

Offline Raleigh111

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 284
  • Country: us
  • live today! you could be gone tomorrow.
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #12 on: June 20, 2017, 05:55:49 AM »
nice job. seems people keep pushing that cam higher up the squeeze ladder. 10,4?
I put a set S&S 570 cams in a 120R Trike, talk about a torque monster compared to the throttle response with the 266e cam set.

Look's great Joe and John :up:

There is allot to be said about a blueprinted build, even just the top end, zero deck, setting the net squish accordingly, then a proper tune.

Some guys don't take the time, but I am of the opinion that if you are there, why not?.
Hell yes, I just had to beg the machinist to take .005 off my cylinders. When i asked him he looked at me like i was crazy. 
Harleys are addicting and im out of money. Accepting donations! 120 132hp 146tq

Offline harpwrench

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 534
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #13 on: June 20, 2017, 07:11:41 AM »
nice job. seems people keep pushing that cam higher up the squeeze ladder. 10,4?
I had a little anxiety about it, but trusted John and Joe. Right off the bat I had to take it into the bowels of downtown kc on a miserable hot day and it never complained a bit.

Offline Raleigh111

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 284
  • Country: us
  • live today! you could be gone tomorrow.
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #14 on: June 20, 2017, 09:47:33 AM »
nice job. seems people keep pushing that cam higher up the squeeze ladder. 10,4?
I had a little anxiety about it, but trusted John and Joe. Right off the bat I had to take it into the bowels of downtown kc on a miserable hot day and it never complained a bit.
let me know in a year? if no issues maybe i will spueeze one to 10.5 :SM:
crazy how it was still over 100tq at 6400rpm.
« Last Edit: June 20, 2017, 09:51:41 AM by Raleigh111 »
Harleys are addicting and im out of money. Accepting donations! 120 132hp 146tq

Offline TorQuePimp

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2926
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #15 on: June 21, 2017, 12:17:58 AM »
nice job. seems people keep pushing that cam higher up the squeeze ladder. 10,4?
I had a little anxiety about it, but trusted John and Joe. Right off the bat I had to take it into the bowels of downtown kc on a miserable hot day and it never complained a bit.
let me know in a year? if no issues maybe i will spueeze one to 10.5 :SM:
crazy how it was still over 100tq at 6400rpm.

They are base cnc heads 1.865/1.585 valves

machined with the guides in them

heads were about as new as new take offs gets

this combo has been done ALOT

anywhere from 10.2-10.4

has to have a good tune....and Joe knocked it out of the park

Offline 1workinman

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 934
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #16 on: June 21, 2017, 03:51:04 AM »
Impressive for a 103

Offline Raleigh111

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 284
  • Country: us
  • live today! you could be gone tomorrow.
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #17 on: June 21, 2017, 10:33:11 AM »
nice job. seems people keep pushing that cam higher up the squeeze ladder. 10,4?
I had a little anxiety about it, but trusted John and Joe. Right off the bat I had to take it into the bowels of downtown kc on a miserable hot day and it never complained a bit.
let me know in a year? if no issues maybe i will spueeze one to 10.5 :SM:
crazy how it was still over 100tq at 6400rpm.

They are base cnc heads 1.865/1.585 valves

machined with the guides in them

heads were about as new as new take offs gets

this combo has been done ALOT

anywhere from 10.2-10.4

has to have a good tune....and Joe knocked it out of the park
How do you set up the intake runners? 1.8 or ?
Harleys are addicting and im out of money. Accepting donations! 120 132hp 146tq

Offline TorQuePimp

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2926
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #18 on: June 21, 2017, 11:00:47 AM »
1.71 see throttle body is a hair larger

Offline harpwrench

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 534
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #19 on: January 08, 2018, 05:37:52 AM »
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Reposting sheet. I put 20k on it this last summer with no PMS

Offline spdrcr

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 112
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #20 on: January 08, 2018, 06:21:17 AM »
Nice job to all involved!

Offline Matt C

  • Locked
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 3288
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 103", FLHTK, JW performance heads, 570 cams
« Reply #21 on: January 08, 2018, 10:02:14 AM »
nice job. seems people keep pushing that cam higher up the squeeze ladder. 10,4?
I had a little anxiety about it, but trusted John and Joe. Right off the bat I had to take it into the bowels of downtown kc on a miserable hot day and it never complained a bit.
let me know in a year? if no issues maybe i will spueeze one to 10.5 :SM:
crazy how it was still over 100tq at 6400rpm.

They are base cnc heads 1.865/1.585 valves

machined with the guides in them

heads were about as new as new take offs gets

this combo has been done ALOT

anywhere from 10.2-10.4

has to have a good tune....and Joe knocked it out of the park

fwiw: The valves John speaks about above, are very good. I've done allot of testing with them.
They'll make power like any 1.9 and the stock seat can be retained w/o any long term issues.

I use these valves in budget head builds all the time and they perform pretty darn close (same)
as the higher priced options.

fyi..

 
« Last Edit: January 08, 2018, 10:27:34 AM by Matt C »