Author Topic: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2  (Read 3396 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline harpwrench

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 624
  • Country: us
2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« on: March 08, 2019, 07:16:44 PM »
Found a sticky rod at 54K, went with an S&S crank and the SE drop on kit

  [ You are not allowed to view attachments ]  

 
« Last Edit: March 08, 2019, 08:21:54 PM by Coyote »

Offline Tail Ridr

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 146
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2019, 03:15:50 AM »
Same cam on the first run?
Eliminate the Imperfections of mass production!

Offline harpwrench

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 624
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2019, 06:20:43 AM »
Same cam on the first run?
No that was at 103 with most everything different.

Offline kd

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7198
  • Country: ca
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2019, 07:12:42 AM »
That's a pretty big exhaust system for a smaller displacement engine.  Do you see chance of any improvement all around with an exhaust change?
KD

Offline harpwrench

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 624
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2019, 08:24:32 AM »
That's a pretty big exhaust system for a smaller displacement engine.  Do you see chance of any improvement all around with an exhaust change?
I imagine it would help some <3000 but i don't think it's killing it terribly, it didn't like fewer discs. It only cranked around 190, so more compression would help too. But then they crank harder and good fuel isn't always available. Honestly I was happy with what I had before down low. My wife has back problems and I absolutely didn't want neck snapping tq in that area or it would be a 117. My goal was quiet hp and just keep on pulling harder when I'm by myself and wind it up.


Offline Jake72

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 67
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2019, 05:54:54 AM »
Nice!! Dropping my bike off at Joe’s today for a tune!

Offline sfmichael

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6012
  • Country: us
  • Hoping to build the next mighty 'mouse'
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2019, 07:49:43 AM »
looks great  :up:

the 103 build was nothing to sneeze at either  :up: - what cam was in that?
Colorado Springs, CO.

Offline harpwrench

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 624
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #7 on: March 15, 2019, 09:47:49 AM »
looks great  :up:

the 103 build was nothing to sneeze at either  :up: - what cam was in that?
585's but it was actually a dud and they came right back out, the 103 made 123/115 with 570's.
« Last Edit: March 15, 2019, 10:12:41 AM by harpwrench »

Offline biggzed

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 2111
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2019, 10:19:05 AM »
Nice run.

Just curious. What symptoms was the engine presenting that caused you to tear it down? In other words, what was the sticky rod doing that made you think there was a problem? Or was this a planned build and you found the sticky rod upon disassembly?

Zach

Offline harpwrench

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 624
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #9 on: March 15, 2019, 10:50:50 AM »
I was just going to bolt on the 110 kit, there were no symptoms or problems with how it was running.

Offline kd

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7198
  • Country: ca
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #10 on: March 15, 2019, 04:13:37 PM »
Both my 98 evos had sticky rods. There was no symptoms and it only showed up when the barrels were pulled for inspection while doing a stage 3 (SE heads, cam etc) on each of them.
KD

Offline joes124

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 89
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #11 on: August 05, 2019, 05:32:17 PM »
I have the Wegner 2-1-2 with 20 discs and a closed end cap (it flows great and is quiet too) on my 2012 RG Ultra that is a 103 with an Andrews 57H cam, RC cycles high flow ac and love it.

Offline C-Cat

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 327
  • Country: 00
  • FFF
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #12 on: August 06, 2019, 04:26:31 PM »
That's a stout 110ci. Congrats to all involved. I take it was a ported stock casting with larger intake valve?
124ci. 07 Streetbob
107ci. '11 Roadglide

Offline harpwrench

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 624
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #13 on: August 06, 2019, 07:07:31 PM »
They’re ported 103 wet heads.

Offline build it

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1732
  • Country: 00
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #14 on: August 08, 2019, 10:19:41 AM »
Nice deal there. Not exactly a run of the mill build.
Get the principles down first, they’ll never change.

Offline TorQuePimp

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3038
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #15 on: October 25, 2019, 10:12:54 PM »
That's a stout 110ci. Congrats to all involved. I take it was a ported stock casting with larger intake valve?

1.95 intake
1.610 exhaust
CNC Chambers are 90.5 out of the machine
1.8" intake port

Offline sfmichael

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6012
  • Country: us
  • Hoping to build the next mighty 'mouse'
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #16 on: November 04, 2019, 10:01:35 AM »
So you've had a summer to ride it - what do you think? 
Colorado Springs, CO.

Offline harpwrench

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 624
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #17 on: November 04, 2019, 10:53:37 AM »
So you've had a summer to ride it - what do you think?

I've put a little over 20K on it this summer, and it's been great! No oil burning, averages 40mpg, no negative behavior of any kind, I love it.

Offline sfmichael

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6012
  • Country: us
  • Hoping to build the next mighty 'mouse'
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #18 on: November 17, 2019, 07:25:43 PM »
So you've had a summer to ride it - what do you think?

I've put a little over 20K on it this summer, and it's been great! No oil burning, averages 40mpg, no negative behavior of any kind, I love it.

 :bike: :up:
Colorado Springs, CO.

Offline lucasg

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 359
  • Country: ca
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #19 on: January 06, 2020, 10:11:57 AM »
So you've had a summer to ride it - what do you think?

I've put a little over 20K on it this summer, and it's been great! No oil burning, averages 40mpg, no negative behavior of any kind, I love it.

Gotta be happy with that.  Nothing like a non pms build that puts a smile on your face after every ride. 👍

Offline sfmichael

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6012
  • Country: us
  • Hoping to build the next mighty 'mouse'
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #20 on: January 12, 2020, 05:42:12 PM »
So you've had a summer to ride it - what do you think?

I've put a little over 20K on it this summer, and it's been great! No oil burning, averages 40mpg, no negative behavior of any kind, I love it.

How do you like the power / powerband? Is it torquey?
Colorado Springs, CO.

Offline harpwrench

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 624
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #21 on: January 12, 2020, 08:15:27 PM »
It’s the kind of power band I enjoy, I normally don’t go full throttle below 3000 in higher gears. But below that it’s still smooth and responsive, has no problem pulling fifth gear through town at 35 if I want to. It feels torquey/happy at all rpm’s. I’m sure it would do a little better if I pushed the compression up but I do run into crap gas areas and also pull a trailer. FWIW I also tried the RH TD this summer, and it made pretty much identical lines up to about 5200 then lost 10 hp. I like the Wegner better:)

Offline Deye76

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 8394
  • Country: 00
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #22 on: January 14, 2020, 10:18:46 AM »
Very good. what is the static compression ?
East Tenn.
2014 CVO RK, 2015 RGS, 1992 FXRP

Offline harpwrench

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 624
  • Country: us
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #23 on: January 14, 2020, 12:21:02 PM »
10.8

Offline sfmichael

  • Site Supporter
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6012
  • Country: us
  • Hoping to build the next mighty 'mouse'
Re: 2016, 110", FLHTK, DME598, SE58, JW Perf heads, Wegner 2-1-2
« Reply #24 on: January 15, 2020, 10:09:30 AM »
great info - thanks  :up:
Colorado Springs, CO.