Muller Hydro Clutch... anyone use it...?

[hattitude]

I just saw a reference to this on another forum...

I never heard of it before, which of course doesn't mean anything, but ai was wondering if anyone has used it and if it's a good mod...

https://www.easternperformance.com/muller-motorcycles-ag-120-60-hydro-clutch-slave-cylinder-14-16-harley-touring-twin-cam.html

[Nastytls]

It says fitment for TC and M8, but then only lists TC models for fitment.... 

[IronButt70]

Even the link says 14-16 TC. 

[HogMike]

Even the link says 14-16 TC. 

The 120-60 is for 2017-up
The 120-50 is the 14-16
The difference is in the design of the pistons
Either seem to work as advertised.
On my 2019 I've put about 2000 miles on the new slave cylinder and it's working perfectly!
I just hope I didn't jinx myself! LOL

[hattitude]

Even the link says 14-16 TC. 

The 120-60 is for 2017-up
The 120-50 is the 14-16
The difference is in the design of the pistons
Either seem to work as advertised.
On my 2019 I've put about 2000 miles on the new slave cylinder and it's working perfectly!
I just hope I didn't jinx myself! LOL

Thanks for the feedback... first time I've heard of it and was curious.....

I've gotten used to the hydraulic clutch on my 2016 bagger, but was irritated by it when I first started riding that bike...

I just like to keep my options open...

[Nastytls]

Even the link says 14-16 TC. 

The 120-60 is for 2017-up
The 120-50 is the 14-16
The difference is in the design of the pistons
Either seem to work as advertised.
On my 2019 I've put about 2000 miles on the new slave cylinder and it's working perfectly!
I just hope I didn't jinx myself! LOL

No issues finding neutral or clunky shifting?

[calif phil]

I just delivered one today on a 2014 CVO FLHT .   I had a 2016 CVO FLTR next to it for comparison.   The guy with the 14 was very happy and the guy with the '16 felt the light pull of the '14 said to put one in mine when you put the new water pump in. 

You will like it!

[HogMike]

Even the link says 14-16 TC. 

The 120-60 is for 2017-up
The 120-50 is the 14-16
The difference is in the design of the pistons
Either seem to work as advertised.
On my 2019 I've put about 2000 miles on the new slave cylinder and it's working perfectly!
I just hope I didn't jinx myself! LOL

No issues finding neutral or clunky shifting?

Most of that is due to type of primary oil, level, heat, etc.. That being said, the clutch will release normally, shifting is about the same as the stock setup, which was always good on the '19
The advantages are wider friction zone at the clutch lever and 40% lighter lever pull.
Really has minimal impact on shifting/neutral issues.
At least on MY bike.

[hattitude]

Even the link says 14-16 TC. 

The 120-60 is for 2017-up
The 120-50 is the 14-16
The difference is in the design of the pistons
Either seem to work as advertised.
On my 2019 I've put about 2000 miles on the new slave cylinder and it's working perfectly!
I just hope I didn't jinx myself! LOL

No issues finding neutral or clunky shifting?

Most of that is due to type of primary oil, level, heat, etc.. That being said, the clutch will release normally, shifting is about the same as the stock setup, which was always good on the '19
The advantages are wider friction zone at the clutch lever and 40% lighter lever pull.
Really has minimal impact on shifting/neutral issues.
At least on MY bike.

I'm really interested in the 40% lighter lever pull....

I will be putting a 124", with stiffer clutch spring and VPI, on my bike in the near future.......

I would assume that the 40% lighter pull, might equate to a stock pull feel with my clutch changes....