April 18, 2024, 12:53:41 PM

News:

For advertising inquiries or help with registration or other issues, you may contact us by email at help@harleytechtalk.com


Carb to EFI Less Power?

Started by WhipLash96, July 13, 2021, 04:13:15 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Don D

The CV 51 is rich at low speeds. It needs emulsion tube changes and more air in the idle circuit.
Contact Gary Williams.  601-939-5861

WhipLash96

Quote from: cheech on July 14, 2021, 08:16:36 AM
Have you fooled with the needle in it?  See you mention pilot and main jet but not the needle. Seems in cruise range you'd be "on the needle".

There has been talk about the needle in other conversations but nothing with the needle has been done at this point. That was the main reason why I called Bob Woods but he quickly told me that the needle isn't the issue.
Thanks,
Whip

WhipLash96

Quote from: HD Street Performance on July 14, 2021, 08:21:07 AM
The CV 51 is rich at low speeds. It needs emulsion tube changes and more air in the idle circuit.
Contact Gary Williams.  601-939-5861

This is what I was suspecting and why I am considering the EFI with the bigger throttle body. It needs more air......
Thanks,
Whip

Hossamania

 Is your enrichener stuck open? Is the accelerator pump dribbling fuel? What other jetting have you tried? I can say the needle affected mine in power and mileage.
If the government gives you everything you want,
it can take everything you have.

rking1550

Quote from: WhipLash96 on July 14, 2021, 08:02:14 AM
Quote from: HogMike on July 13, 2021, 07:26:53 PM
I took my softail out today after reading this post just to see if I should change it to EFI.
It's a 2000 model, 95". Mild cam and heads to match.
It was so much fun riding the twisties and hitting the throttle on the uphill curves I decided to just quit messing with it and enjoy the ride.

:potstir:

Here is the situation. I am running PIG RICH with this CV 51 and I am not able to get the afr into acceptable range. I have the stock CV 51 main in it  (248) and a 44 pilot in it and my rear cylinder is still at like 10.9 and the front cylinder is at 11.5. This is real time data as I have a set of Weggo's hooked up to the bike. My bike makes a lot of power for the cam choice at this current jetting but we all know that this isn't necessarily good to run at such a rich afr. I spoke to Bob Woods about this issue that I am not able to get this any better and he offered a solution for this, but, i can't justify the expense for a carb. Now I have a 58mm TB and all the other things needed to convert my bike to EFI as I have had it for a long time. What I want to do is to put the EFI on and retune. If I lose power as my builder suggests, i will put a different cam in. My fuel mileage SUCKS and understandably with that kind of AFR.

Just curious. what was Bob Woods suggesting to fix the issue ? I'm in a similar situation with one of his  king 505 CV 51 carbs,  rich low rpms & not the best fuel mileage,   I average 32 mpg.
124"@ 11.1 to 1, T-man 662-2, T-man thumper, woods CV 51 carb,  Bassini RR

WhipLash96

Quote from: rking1550 on July 14, 2021, 10:36:04 AM
Quote from: WhipLash96 on July 14, 2021, 08:02:14 AM
Quote from: HogMike on July 13, 2021, 07:26:53 PM
I took my softail out today after reading this post just to see if I should change it to EFI.
It's a 2000 model, 95". Mild cam and heads to match.
It was so much fun riding the twisties and hitting the throttle on the uphill curves I decided to just quit messing with it and enjoy the ride.

:potstir:



Here is the situation. I am running PIG RICH with this CV 51 and I am not able to get the afr into acceptable range. I have the stock CV 51 main in it  (248) and a 44 pilot in it and my rear cylinder is still at like 10.9 and the front cylinder is at 11.5. This is real time data as I have a set of Weggo's hooked up to the bike. My bike makes a lot of power for the cam choice at this current jetting but we all know that this isn't necessarily good to run at such a rich afr. I spoke to Bob Woods about this issue that I am not able to get this any better and he offered a solution for this, but, i can't justify the expense for a carb. Now I have a 58mm TB and all the other things needed to convert my bike to EFI as I have had it for a long time. What I want to do is to put the EFI on and retune. If I lose power as my builder suggests, i will put a different cam in. My fuel mileage SUCKS and understandably with that kind of AFR.

Just curious. what was Bob Woods suggesting to fix the issue ? I'm in a similar situation with one of his  king 505 CV 51 carbs,  rich low rpms & not the best fuel mileage,   I average 32 mpg.

When I spoke to Bob, he was saying that the entire carb would have to be stripped down to the casting. There are three sealed passage ways that would need to be checked and repaired as needed. Cost= $700 minimum. Your gas mileage is same ball park as mine.
Thanks,
Whip

WhipLash96

Quote from: Hossamania on July 14, 2021, 10:29:50 AM
Is your enrichener stuck open? Is the accelerator pump dribbling fuel? What other jetting have you tried? I can say the needle affected mine in power and mileage.

From just "feel" the choke is closed all the way. This "could be" a problem area as when I choke the bike to start it and once the bike is running, the bike does not idle up like it should. This leads me to think that what Bob Woods is saying is true, but do I really want to throw a grand at a carb?
Thanks,
Whip

Hossamania

Would a Mikuni 48 work? Easier install than EFI.
If you have all the parts for EFI, that may be the way to go. Plus the cost of tune.
If the government gives you everything you want,
it can take everything you have.

Hossamania

What are the details of the motor?
If the government gives you everything you want,
it can take everything you have.

Hossamania

Quote from: WhipLash96 on July 14, 2021, 10:46:47 AM
Quote from: Hossamania on July 14, 2021, 10:29:50 AM
Is your enrichener stuck open? Is the accelerator pump dribbling fuel? What other jetting have you tried? I can say the needle affected mine in power and mileage.

From just "feel" the choke is closed all the way. This "could be" a problem area as when I choke the bike to start it and once the bike is running, the bike does not idle up like it should. This leads me to think that what Bob Woods is saying is true, but do I really want to throw a grand at a carb?

I just reread your other thread about EFI conversion, add the cost of a new tank to your EFI conversion, where does that put the carb cost verses EFI install?
If the government gives you everything you want,
it can take everything you have.

rigidthumper

It's been a minute, but the mods I remember doing were as follows- CV51 NDKS needle 48 Pilot, 210 main, #50 hole drilled into the plate, +4 Emulsion tube mod.  Drilling a #50 hole in the plate allowed me to set idle AFR with the idle mix screw. Before adding the hole, idle mix had no affect.
Adding the 4 holes in the emulsion tube (I followed the stock pattern, and size, just made new rows above the existing ones, deburring the inside when done) allowed me to have normal mid range, cruise upper 13s, and the main worked pretty well at WOT.
Ignorance is bliss, and accuracy expensive. How much of either can you afford?

capn

Those afr meters dont work well at lower rpms with a big motor and long duration.I tried one and it told me I was rich.I rejetted leaner and bike ran like crap.Went back to what I had and got rid of the afr meter.120 cubes with S&S G.

WhipLash96

Quote from: Hossamania on July 14, 2021, 10:57:58 AM
Would a Mikuni 48 work? Easier install than EFI.
If you have all the parts for EFI, that may be the way to go. Plus the cost of tune.

I could go to a Mikuni but a smaller carb on a 124? Going backwards in my opinion. Yes, it will cost me more to do the efi but the benefits of EFI vs Carb are worth it to me. As of now, all I need for the EFI is the fuel pump and some hoses. I have the tuner, ECM TB and so on.....
Thanks,
Whip

WhipLash96

Quote from: capn on July 14, 2021, 01:06:50 PM
Those afr meters dont work well at lower rpms with a big motor and long duration.I tried one and it told me I was rich.I rejetted leaner and bike ran like crap.Went back to what I had and got rid of the afr meter.120 cubes with S&S G.

Right. I have been taking readings from all over the RPM range and it has been pretty consistent.  :nix:
Thanks,
Whip

kd

If your AFR readings are less than optimal I would expect a conversion to a well tuned EFI to be better.  If you have a sheet and stats on your carb set-up, page through the dyno section for some 124 examples close to what you'll have.  They probably will be better than what you are describing.
KD

Admiral Akbar

Quote from: WhipLash96 on July 14, 2021, 04:20:47 PM
Quote from: Hossamania on July 14, 2021, 10:57:58 AM
Would a Mikuni 48 work? Easier install than EFI.
If you have all the parts for EFI, that may be the way to go. Plus the cost of tune.

I could go to a Mikuni but a smaller carb on a 124? Going backwards in my opinion. Yes, it will cost me more to do the efi but the benefits of EFI vs Carb are worth it to me. As of now, all I need for the EFI is the fuel pump and some hoses. I have the tuner, ECM TB and so on.....

48 flows more than a 51.

HogMike

Quote from: WhipLash96 on July 14, 2021, 04:20:47 PM
Quote from: Hossamania on July 14, 2021, 10:57:58 AM
Would a Mikuni 48 work? Easier install than EFI.
If you have all the parts for EFI, that may be the way to go. Plus the cost of tune.

I could go to a Mikuni but a smaller carb on a 124? Going backwards in my opinion. Yes, it will cost me more to do the efi but the benefits of EFI vs Carb are worth it to me. As of now, all I need for the EFI is the fuel pump and some hoses. I have the tuner, ECM TB and so on.....

Sounds like you already made a decision.
Keep us posted how it all turns out.
:missed:
HOGMIKE
SoCal

JW113

I would suggest you exhaust all possibility to tune the CV51 before making any big decisions about changing it. I have one on my bike, it runs awesome, gets 45mpg or better (if I can keep the speed reasonable, that is!). The changes that rigidthumper described above is very similar to what I have in mine. Am I reading that right, you ave a 248 main jet? That seems WAY to big, I've got a 200 in mine, A/F is like 12.6 at WOT. If you have a cam with a lot of duration, which I'm guessing you do, these big motors will not hardly idle without opening up the throttle plate. When you do this, it exposes the first of the transfer ports and pulls fuel from there instead of from the idle jet port. This is why they run like crap and very rich at idle. Drilling an air bleed hole in the throttle plate is a must do on a big hot rod engine. You should really try that right away. And yes, needles make a big difference at the low/mid. I have an NDKT in mine, the leanest one from the HD tuner kit. And more holes in the emulsion tube is very helpful.

-JW
2004 FLHRS   1977 FLH Shovelhead  1992 FLSTC
1945 Indian Chief   1978 XL Bobber

WhipLash96

Quote from: HogMike on July 14, 2021, 08:15:28 PM
Quote from: WhipLash96 on July 14, 2021, 04:20:47 PM
Quote from: Hossamania on July 14, 2021, 10:57:58 AM
Would a Mikuni 48 work? Easier install than EFI.
If you have all the parts for EFI, that may be the way to go. Plus the cost of tune.

I could go to a Mikuni but a smaller carb on a 124? Going backwards in my opinion. Yes, it will cost me more to do the efi but the benefits of EFI vs Carb are worth it to me. As of now, all I need for the EFI is the fuel pump and some hoses. I have the tuner, ECM TB and so on.....

Sounds like you already made a decision.
Keep us posted how it all turns out.
:missed:

I just made up my mind yesterday what it is that I am going to do. I am going to go ahead and convert it to fuel injection.
Thanks,
Whip

klammer76

I gained 8 HP and 5 ft#'s of torque when I converted my 2002 FLH to Delphi efi.

xlfan

Quote from: rigidthumper on July 14, 2021, 11:47:00 AM
It's been a minute, but the mods I remember doing were as follows- CV51 NDKS needle 48 Pilot, 210 main, #50 hole drilled into the plate, +4 Emulsion tube mod.  Drilling a #50 hole in the plate allowed me to set idle AFR with the idle mix screw. Before adding the hole, idle mix had no affect.
Adding the 4 holes in the emulsion tube (I followed the stock pattern, and size, just made new rows above the existing ones, deburring the inside when done) allowed me to have normal mid range, cruise upper 13s, and the main worked pretty well at WOT.

Is the location of the #50 hole in plate critical?

rigidthumper

I placed it 1/2" down from the top, centered.
Ignorance is bliss, and accuracy expensive. How much of either can you afford?

rking1550

Quote from: klammer76 on July 20, 2021, 10:21:36 PM
I gained 8 HP and 5 ft#'s of torque when I converted my 2002 FLH to Delphi efi.

Do you know how much it cost to do the conversion, including tuner and tune ?
124"@ 11.1 to 1, T-man 662-2, T-man thumper, woods CV 51 carb,  Bassini RR

WhipLash96

Quote from: klammer76 on July 20, 2021, 10:21:36 PM
I gained 8 HP and 5 ft#'s of torque when I converted my 2002 FLH to Delphi efi.

Good to hear! This is about what I would expect from this kind of change...
Thanks,
Whip