News:

Main Menu

Andrews 57H

Started by wfolarry, February 05, 2012, 01:55:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

troop

Thinking he won't be able to release any info until Andrews gives the go ahead. That said, didn't it take awhile for Andrews to release the 48H from beta > production? Thought months ....

Hillside Motorcycle

.....................then wtf make mention of it.............
Otto Knowbetter sez, "Even a fish wouldn't get caught if he kept his mouth shut"

strokerjlk

A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis
repeated testing establishes theory

ultra 08

I think the thing everyone has to keep in mind is who Steve is testing the cams for. It is not his call as to when or what info he can release.
I respect the point that he is trying to make and I respect Steve for sticking to his guns. I would bet if he releases info with out the proper ok
it would probably be the last set of cams he tested for them. As the man said he will release info when he can plain and simple.

2008 105th Anniversary Edition Ultra Classic

Don D

Wouldn't it of been better to just not mention anything until the company released the authorization?

rotten

Quote from: Deweysheads on February 07, 2012, 08:05:37 PM
Wouldn't it of been better to just not mention anything until the company released the authorization?

:agree: Exactly what i was thinking. Why even bring it up.

Smarty

It's a, I know something you don't know! LOL
Suspended by Smarty
Carol Burks

RXBOB

You blokes are harsh

Steve just said that he had been asked to test some of the cams and that when he can release the info I am sure he will

gotta respect him for that

autoworker

#33
Quote from: wfolarry on February 05, 2012, 01:55:25 PM
57H   18/38  100  236  .560  .184
         46/14  106  240  .560  .153
Give you something else to think about before the warm weather gets here. :wink:

I think Larry's post sums it up.It's not available yet.The specs. are listed.

It gives us something to think about until Andrews releases them for sale.

I don't understand  :gob:.

:smilep:

btw...thanks for the heads up Larry. :up:
It must be true,I read it on the internet.

Back Road Mike

Quote from: GMR-PERFORMANCE on February 07, 2012, 06:56:25 AM
I will have to find out if Andrews is ready for us to release the results.  I can tell you that we started with a 2011 103 RG bone stock for the base line. Installed a Crusher ex and a/c kit tts tuner and the cam. Backed it up with the same bike and the 54 cam re tuned with same parts.  I am still looking for a CVO 110 test bike for this cam also.

Dang, wish I lived closer.  :emsad:

troop

Didn't he also test the 48H in pre-production form? Thought it was referred to something like X1 Express or similar ??

Barrett

Quote from: GMR-PERFORMANCE on February 06, 2012, 06:43:52 AM
We have been testing it. Have back to back sheets on it from a bone stock engine to the cam + a/c + exh,  and with another of the andrews cams.  Yes a high lift 37... I guess when they give us the go ahead to post the numbers you guys will know if the lift really helped it..
I think they should have been compared to the 37's instead of the 54's for a true lift comparison.

PanHeadRed

57H   18/38  100  236  .560  .184
         46/14  106  240  .560  .153

SP232 16/36  100  232  .57
           44/16 104  240  .57

Comparing it to the SP232 my guess is it will work real well for lot's of riders in 95's, 96's, 103's and 110's the high lift being a +

acbacb

#38
I'm happy to have a heads up on the 57H. I understand the sheets can't be released at present. That is Andrews call. When they give the "go ahead", we shall see.

It looks like the 57H is a definite possibility when my warranty runs out. Of course I want to see the sheets as well. I imagine a properly built 103 will have good early torque that carries out pretty far. That is just what I want. Plus if strokerjlk likes it, that's a big plus since he will be the builder/tuner.  :bike:
2012 FLHX Street Glide

happyman

Quote from: autoworker on February 08, 2012, 02:14:45 AM
Quote from: wfolarry on February 05, 2012, 01:55:25 PM
57H   18/38  100  236  .560  .184
         46/14  106  240  .560  .153
Give you something else to think about before the warm weather gets here. :wink:

I think Larry's post sums it up.It's not available yet.The specs. are listed.

well put my thoughts exactly .. its winter and lots of people may  wait,  if they see something that could be what they are looking for.  oh well have to have something to  bitch about.

It gives us something to think about until Andrews releases them for sale.

I don't understand  :gob:.

:smilep:

btw...thanks for the heads up Larry. :up:

djl

#40
I like knowing that Steve is testing and that we will be able to see some of that data when the cams are released and decide whether or not the cam is of any interest.  Nothing to get panties in wad about. :scratch: Tnanks to Larry and Steve for the info; any guesses as to when the cams might hit the street?

djl

Quote from: PanHeadRed
57H   18/38  100  236  .560  .184
         46/14  106  240  .560  .153

SP232 16/36  100  232  .57
           44/16 104  240  .57

Comparing it to the SP232 my guess is it will work real well for lot's of riders in 95's, 96's, 103's and 110's the high lift being a +

Red,
Is the SP232 available as a converison cam? What is the TDC lift?

Barrett

Quote from: djl on February 08, 2012, 09:10:15 AM
I like knowing that Steve is testing and that we will be able to see some of that data when the cams are released and decide whether or not the cam is of any interest.  Nothing to get panties in wad about. :scratch: Tnanks to Larry and Steve for the info; any guesses as to when the cams might hit the street?
I like seeing the tests too but comparing them to the 54's isn't too much of a test to see what the extra lift will do, it should have been done with 37's for that. I do like the specs and I'm sure they will work good though.

Don D

#43
We all like test data but trying to quantify a result from a cam test would correlate to the bike and equipment as tested.
The result does not make this cam (or the manufacturer) a looser or winner on when paired with other combination of parts, I believe the CVO 110 test, if that materializes will prove YMMV

djl

Better than no test data at all; picky, picky, picky. :emoGroan:

bajabob

Thanks for the heads-up Steve.  I'm sure there are plenty around here that appreciate any info they can get about new products, gives us something to think/dream about.  You have always been generous with your knowledge not like  some from the right side of the map always trying to turn it into a poker game
Better to remain silent and appear ignorant than to speak and remove all doubt

WhipLash96

Quote from: djl on February 08, 2012, 12:27:48 PM
Better than no test data at all; picky, picky, picky. :emoGroan:

Problem is Don that he didn't give test data. He gave specs. I agree with most, if he can't release the information, keep it to yourself until you can. Problem is though, anyone with an engine simulator (Desktop) can add those cam specs into the system and get real close to how those cams perform.  :wink:
Thanks,<br />Whip

boooby1744

A lot of cams out there in the .555-.575 lift area.............. :scratch:

HD/Wrench

 You got post is removed.  you all have a blessed day.  :teeth:

Herko

Quote from: GMR-PERFORMANCE on February 08, 2012, 02:38:58 PM
You got post is removed.  you all have a blessed day.  :teeth:
Hang in there Steve...it comes with the R&D territory.
That's why AP showers you with new Corvettes, lavish vacations and lucrative stock options.
Considering a power upgrade?
First and foremost, focus on your tuning plan.