News:


Main Menu

Brake Pads

Started by BillP, July 02, 2013, 06:47:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BillP

I was just wondering what some of you guys were getting for mileage out
of brake pads on Baggers. I've got 16,000 on my 11' FLHTC and I know a
lot of guys go to something other than H-D when it is time to get new ones.
I'm sure there are some pads that are as good or better than stock and maybe a little cheaper too. Anyway, your input is appreciated. Thanks, Bill

Buffalo

  I've run SBS pads for over 10 yrs now. Current set has 42000klms, still fine. They are cheaper $$, better stopping and far less dust than the HD stuff. They have specific pads for front and rear. Buffalo

JohnCA58

Not cheaper than OEM, but I always use Lyndall Gold + pads,  great stopping power and longevity.  :up:
YOLO

bigbearkiller

I got solid wheels.....Lyndall are dust free.If anyone gets a new bike they should dump the stock pads immediately.

Deye76

With PM rotors and Lyndall....37,275 miles on the rear pads, still going. About the same on the front so far.
East Tenn.<br /> 2020 Lowrider S Touring, 2014 CVO RK,  1992 FXRP

mrmike

I've been running Lyndall Gold on my 03 RK since the first set of OEM's wore out, these pads perform flawlessly and as said no dust which if your running white walls is a big plus.

I just put the parts together for an upgrade to a set of JayBrake 6 piston calipers and just waiting for the Lyndall pads for these which are on back order I will not even bother installing the calipers with the OEM pads they came with, I like the Lyndalls that much.

As an aside here if we were talking tires here I could understand posting milage but brakes are an entirely different animal considering they're only wearing when you apply them. Riders out in the rural areas will get considerably more milage out of their pads than those of us with a stoplight or sign every 100' here in the City not even taking into consideration riding styles, same with clutches.

Mike

I'm not leaving til I have a good time

Deye76

"Riders out in the rural areas will get considerably more milage out of their pads than those of us with a stoplight or sign every 100' here in the City not even taking into consideration riding styles,"

Excellent point.  :up: I try to look way ahead, anticipate and slow down before appying the brakes. From my truck driving days. 
East Tenn.<br /> 2020 Lowrider S Touring, 2014 CVO RK,  1992 FXRP

mrmike

Yup, I watch the tailights of the cars in front of the cars I'm riding behind,lol.

Mike
I'm not leaving til I have a good time

cycleman11

Riding style is going to dictate how long the brake pads are going to last.  Folks that do a lot of trail braking will us up pads much quicker as well as those that ride the twisties a lot.  When changing pads make sure to check the thickness of the disk.  The minimum thickness will be stamped on the edge.

texaskatfish

Katfish  Vice President   Cypress Chapter BACA
RIP Jester http://bacaworld.org/

stro1965

Just replaced the stock pads on the front of my Ultra at 15K.  Both sets were toast.  Rear pads still look new.

truck

Quote from: texaskatfish on July 03, 2013, 06:30:51 AM

+1000 for Lyndall!
:agree: And they don't wear out the rotor like some pads I've used.
Listen to the jingle the rumble and the roar.

04 SE Deuce

:up:  Lyndall.  Gold+ if you want more pucker power.  Z+ may last a little longer,  are even easier on rotors and will stop as well or slightly better than stock pads.
Several good posts in this thread.   Rick

rideflhr

The stock pads on my '06 Roadking had 36,000 mi and looked like the would go another 36 when I traded it last year. My 2012 Deluxe has 9000 miles and the pads are about done. I almost never use the rear brake and ride solo,yet the rears really are thin. My rear tire lasted 7000 barely.

Tsani

Quote from: rideflhr on July 03, 2013, 12:04:15 PM
The stock pads on my '06 Roadking had 36,000 mi and looked like the would go another 36 when I traded it last year. My 2012 Deluxe has 9000 miles and the pads are about done. I almost never use the rear brake and ride solo,yet the rears really are thin. My rear tire lasted 7000 barely.

I would check that out. Something isn't right. I get 15 to 18 thou out of my o5's rear tire. The stock break pads went about 25 thou. I have LRB's on since then with 90654 on the clock and the pads are just under half done.
ᏣᎳᎩ ᎤᏕᏅ ᎠᏴ ᎠᎩᎸᏗ ᏔᎷᎩᏍᎩ ᎠᏂᏐᏈᎵ
ᎠᏎᏊᎢ Leonard Peltier

MaxxV4

I just replaced the rear OEM pads on my 12 LTD. They had just over 23K miles on them and from the back, looked to be worn out. When I pulled them out, there was still some pad material left since the wear indicators had some groove left in them. I replaced them anyway with the Lyndall Z plus for the rear, when I do the fronts, I will try the Lyndall gold.

sonicskip

Lyndall Z+ pads and Lyndall floating rotors here. No dust, no squeak, plenty of stopping power.

Skip
01 FXSTDI   Tucson,AZ

BillP

I just mentioned that I had !6,000 on my bike, I didnt mean that they were wore out yet
although looking at them, they look thin but I dont think they are real thick to start with.
I am going to look closer though because we might head to Colorado after a couple days
in Sturgis this year and riding double and pulling a trailer I dont want any problems.

Tsani

I do my own tires. One thing I do with a new one is gauge the tread depth with it inflated that way I have a known starting point to guesstimate wear life. I say guesstimate because they do not as a rule wear at the same rate the thinner the tread gets. But you can get a good idea. 
ᏣᎳᎩ ᎤᏕᏅ ᎠᏴ ᎠᎩᎸᏗ ᏔᎷᎩᏍᎩ ᎠᏂᏐᏈᎵ
ᎠᏎᏊᎢ Leonard Peltier

05Train

The Lyndalls are better than stock, but I was never happy with their performance in the wet.  I switched to EBC HH Sintered, and couldn't be happier. They bite RIGHT NOW, modulate well, and are amazing in the rain.  They dust less than stock, a bit more than the Lyndalls. 


Sent from my iPad, probably while I'm pooping.
2005 Vivid Black Night Train - Lots 'o black
'12 FLHTCUSE7

Bigs

I just put Lyndall Golds all around on my '11 RGU. The stock pads were still OK but I changed them since I replaced the tires with Michelin Commander II's. The pads seem as good as stock and the Commander II's seem to work well in the rain and dry road. One thing about the Commanders is that they don't sing every time I go around turns like the stock ones did.
   Bigs

04 SE Deuce

Quote from: 05Train on July 04, 2013, 07:07:51 PM
The Lyndalls are better than stock, but I was never happy with their performance in the wet.  I switched to EBC HH Sintered, and couldn't be happier. They bite RIGHT NOW, modulate well, and are amazing in the rain.  They dust less than stock, a bit more than the Lyndalls.

I'm guessing it's been some years since you tried Lyndall's.  Paul changed compounds which corrected that issue years back AFAIK.   Rick

klammer76

I am ordering front pads either today (if open) or on Monday for my 02 FLH. I take it by the replies here and search that the Lyndalls are a definate improvement and worth the $ correct? I don't mind spending for quality & improvement but just don't want hype. I am looking for improved front braking so Lyndall Gold + (front) and Z (rear)?

Thanks,
Klammer

Tsani

I don't think you will be unhappy with them. Just be sure to clean the caliper, pins, pucks, etc well while your at it.

I still run stock rotors. Every so often I take a red strach pad and deglase the contact areas. Don't know that you need to but works for me.
ᏣᎳᎩ ᎤᏕᏅ ᎠᏴ ᎠᎩᎸᏗ ᏔᎷᎩᏍᎩ ᎠᏂᏐᏈᎵ
ᎠᏎᏊᎢ Leonard Peltier

crazy joe

While were talking brakes my pads look good but my rotors are worn.
I haven't mic them but I'm sure the out of spec. Whats good for replacing
rotors.. stock or aftermarket? when it comes time to change pads I'm going
to have to do all three rotors, its a 03 Electra Glide.