News:

Main Menu

Stage kits

Started by BVHOG, August 23, 2016, 09:05:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hybredhog

  Well maybe it is as simple as it seems. less valve weight, less spring pressure , larger base circles, better geometry, and a possibly weakened/more accurate lifters. So with all of these & metallurgy on a STOCK engine just might last a "life time".  But who's life time, your average rider might put on less than 5k miles a year, will it see 100k^?
'01 FXDXT, '99 FXDL/XRD, '76 FLH

Soft 02

The lifetime of the warranty!
07 FXST 124" Vee Twin built!
66 Triumph Tiger TR6 DOA

rbabos


koko3052


Latrobedyna

If you look at the specs of a stock 107 versus a 114 it appears from what i seen the stroke is different. With that being said what if you used the bigbore 114 kit on the 114 motor? wouldn't it net you a 120" motor. Please don't laugh at me just wondering out loud is all.
2006 FXDB , 95" 57H +4% cam, 10:25 pistons: Ported head's. Lots a fun

rigidthumper

Ignorance is bliss, and accuracy expensive. How much of either can you afford?

00se

Talked to the parts man at our local dealer. He told me Harley has two kits. One is a 107 to a 114. The other a 114 to a 117.

FSG

Stock the 114 has both bore and stroke over the 107



the Big Bore Kit increase to 4.075 is better bang for the $$ for the 107 rather than the 114 although the result isn't to be sneezed at. 

Personally I'd be looking to see how far the cylinders can be bored before lashing out the $$$$



happyman

on the 117" have to wonder how far it can be punched out?  could be a 120"?