Rush 2to1

[JT Metal]

In general.....what are your thoughts w/2.5" baffle. Cruise, wide open, power, etc......

[1workinman]

In general.....what are your thoughts w/2.5" baffle. Cruise, wide open, power, etc......

on what size motor . That's what on my 124

[JT Metal]

103"

[IronMike113]

I have a Rush Wrath 2.5 baffle,on my 113" Touring Bike,(Per BVBOB Razorback) I love it,nice Torque Curve,mellow when Cruising,Loud enough if you want some NASCAR sound,and a good Price from Bob,,,,,,,,, 👍

[JT Metal]

Based on the two responses & wanting to keep my power where I need it. I should consider a 2.25"

[1workinman]

 I was thinking that the smaller inch motor would use the smaller baffle an respond better in the lower rpms  . I would suggest you speak to a tuner 

[JT Metal]

I'll go see Frank @ Dragos tomorrow. He'll agree with you. Bike runs good. No decel piping or anything.

[No Cents]

   Rush Wrath with the 2.5" baffle is a nice pipe.    I wouldn't hesitate putting one on a 103. The Rush pipe with the 2.25" baffle is a different pipe than the Wrath. Get a Wrath...and if you think the 2.5" baffle is too much for your 103 you can always buy a 2.25" baffle and easily install it into the Wrath pipe.

[JT Metal]

No cents.....how can you tell the difference. I think it's a wrath....came with a 2.5" & 3" baffle. Slip on is appx 3.75". If that makes sense.

[No Cents]

   if it came with those two baffles it's probably a Wrath.
Rush did make a 2n1 pipe that came with a 2.25" baffle...that wasn't a Wrath. The Wrath out performs the standard Rush 2n1.

[JT Metal]

Reaper ..........didn't know which is which.

[jmorton10]

I'm pretty sure Frank Drago's Dragula is the same pipe as the Wrath.

I had that pipe on my 124 for a couple years.  It ran great but then it broke in half right where the two pipes join together.  Frank said "send it back & I'll fix it" but I haven't bothered to do it.  It's too much of a PITA to find a box that big etc.etc.

~John

[Durwood]

I would go with the 2.5" baffle.

I have tried the 2.250" baffle in a Wrath on a 103 back to back with a 2.5" and the smaller baffle only choked off the horsepower with no additional low end.

Here is the final run with the 2.5" baffle.
[attach=0]

[838]

 

I would go with the 2.5" baffle.

I have tried the 2.250" baffle in a Wrath on a 103 back to back with a 2.5" and the smaller baffle only choked off the horsepower with no additional low end.

Here is the final run with the 2.5" baffle.
[attach=0,msg1313953]

Good lookin 103"!

I have the wrath with 2.5" on my 136hp 117". Looks to be Pretty versatile setup that you can keep if you decide to up the cubes later. Remember though the bike in the dyno sheet above probably hits 11:1 compression.

[838]

Reaper ..........didn't know which is which.

I ordered a wrath, my box said reaper on it. I believe the wrath has a 4" slip on and the reaper a 3.5"? Mine had the 4" in the box. 140/136 whether it's a reaper or wrath 

[1workinman]

I would go with the 2.5" baffle.

I have tried the 2.250" baffle in a Wrath on a 103 back to back with a 2.5" and the smaller baffle only choked off the horsepower with no additional low end.

Here is the final run with the 2.5" baffle.
[attach=0,msg1313953]

There is the very reason you ask a guy like Durwood who dyno motors .

[BVHOG]

I have changed the baffles in and out from 2.25 to 3 inch and the 2 1/2 work great on just about everything.