does anyone have the cam specs for a TTS 150 ,TDC lifts will do.
Good luck......he keeps his specs tighter than fort knox!
86
Need the TDC lifts to check for clearance
They're designed for bolt in, stock. I run them in a 117" drop in kit, .030 head gasket. Just right for my riding style. I was told by TTS don't go over 10.3-1 and max lift is proprietary info :nix: had a copy of specs someone did but can't locate it. I do have the 100's info.
you could give Steve Cole a call
going on a 110 with 10.2:1 comp,how do you like them on you 117
Last 110 we did made 112/125 with a handsome torque curve at 10.3 and that cam. Cam limited but bumping on the stock throttle body next. It clears fine with my 1.9 x 1.575 heads at 2.030 protrusion. Had .060 @ .2 x .2. You have to do a mock up to check piston to valve unless he gives you the numbers. Call him up.
If you're using 110 heads, and the valves are stock size, there will be no issues at all. If flat top pistons, again there will be no issues. These are designed for use in 110 HD motor configurations. Meaning heads and relation of the valves to the pistons.
Steve's dyno sheet reflects a 117 drop on kit, with a 58mm TB. And the resulting compression of 9.9:1. Pretty stout IMO. With the compression at 10.2:1, the tune needs to be spot on. But is very doable.
http://www.mastertune.net/products_camshafts.html
110 heads,2.100 intake valves,92.5 chambers ,55 mm HPI T/B Fulsac exhaust system with 2" cores will keep you informed after Russ tunes it
Quote from: RTMike on November 17, 2019, 10:50:27 AM
going on a 110 with 10.2:1 comp,how do you like them on you 117
I really like the way my bike performs now, I did do a DD7 at the same time so I'm thinking she spools up faster than the stock would. Got 132 tq, 111 hp, works well for me.
Ok here are the results as I promised torque 114.3 power 109.43
Ought to be a fun ride :chop: Somehow after seeing a 107 done with the 150 @ 112/122, I was thinking of heading this route, myself...seems like a nicely matched build, but I may have expected a bit more (+6hp/+10tq?) after seeing how well they have also performed on the 117's...or would I be expecting too much? :scratch: Don't get me wrong, it should still be a joy to ride! Congrats!
https://www.cvoharley.com/smf/index.php?topic=114916.0 (for reference)
Would the difference be found in a CNC 103 heads vs the CVO heads?
From the info I see, you're just under 10:1, that combo should live a long and healthy life, have stock like manners, and tolerate regular fuel well.
If at some point in the future you want more, drop on the 117 kit and retune!
The CVO heads on this build flowed very well,the intakes were changed to 2.1" the originals were hammered out from the heavy valve springs.Replaced the springs and ported and flowed.
As for the 103 CNC heads that's your call.I have a 103 bike I'm working on with CNC HDCC heads on it they work well also it will be interesting to see what comes out of the build,TMan 625 cams at 10.5:1
Yes the lower compression was part of the plan for a touring bike and crappy gas on the road.
This should be a fun bike to ride across the continent