HarleyTechTalk

Dyno & Tuning Zone => AFR & Tuning Zone => Topic started by: Mikael on November 07, 2019, 12:17:33 PM

Title: autotune basic vs target tune
Post by: Mikael on November 07, 2019, 12:17:33 PM
Hi all, I've got a question about autotune. I did autotune sessions in basic mode on my fxfbs 114 and recently I installed a target tune. I did autotune with it but results are different for the rear cylinder in the cruising area (VE decreased to 5-15%). For the front one, results are very close in both maps. Does anyone has an advice?
Title: Re: autotune basic vs target tune
Post by: rageglide on November 07, 2019, 07:25:37 PM
O2 sensors in the same location?  Otherwise the biggest benefit to the target tune and "pro" versions of autotune are speed and range of flexibility, and of course TT allowing you to go closed loop using WB sensors.
Title: Re: autotune basic vs target tune
Post by: Mikael on November 08, 2019, 03:58:18 AM
yes, O2 sensors are in the same location. these benefits are the reason I decided to install a TT. When I replaced the narrow band O2 sensors, the rear one was blacker wich left me thinkink basic autotune would make the rear cylinder to work richer. I tried the SEPST with smartuning and it was nearly the same with basic autotune...
Title: Re: autotune basic vs target tune
Post by: rbabos on November 08, 2019, 08:58:53 AM
Basic autotune is just that. Basic and in my view not worth "Potty mouth". It will improve running once it modifies the cal but it has a long way to go for a good tune. TT takes it to the next level.
Ron
Title: Re: autotune basic vs target tune
Post by: Mikael on November 10, 2019, 08:53:53 AM
thanks guy so I'm gonna reinstall my TT.