would like your thoughts on the run out on a 2005 fxdi
first test was at 15,000 mile and it was .0015 and the test today at 40,000 is .0020was looking at gear drive.
How old is the battery?
-JW
A 0.0005" run-out variation is pretty small and could easily be attributable to measuring technique.
Jason
:agree:
Quote from: Norton Commando on September 03, 2020, 06:05:55 AM
A 0.0005" run-out variation is pretty small and could easily be attributable to measuring technique.
Jason
Maybe temperatures of all components when measuring, or using different measuring tools? :nix:
You do realize that you're making a lot of people jealous by having a stock flywheel assembly that's got 40K miles and only .002" runout.
I don't think he was worried, I think he was just bragging!
Quote from: les on September 03, 2020, 01:15:14 PM
You do realize that you're making a lot of people jealous by having a stock flywheel assembly that's got 40K miles and only .002" runout.
Yes, .002 runout, i'd say run it. We checked mine on my 2011 RG and it was under .003. I proceeded with S&S 110 drop in. Anyone see there 110 drop in come in with the pistons down in the hole and if so, how much?
Quote from: Hossamania on September 03, 2020, 02:13:36 PM
I don't think he was worried, I think he was just bragging!
Quote from: les on September 03, 2020, 01:15:14 PM
You do realize that you're making a lot of people jealous by having a stock flywheel assembly that's got 40K miles and only .002" runout.
So your saying I'm good to go :scoot:
Mine has .0045 runout and Im fine with that compared to some others Ive checked RUN IT
To kind of put it into perspective, Feuling says you can run their pump and plate with 3 to 4 thou runout, and their stuff is very precise and picky.
Like Hoss says, I'd be bragging too if my runout was that good on a stock flywheel assembly after that many miles. Your bottom end appears in very good shape, in my opinion.
My 05 was .005". I used a conversion cam setup.
It's within service limit. Nothing to fix at this point.
-JW