Which cam for my 110" ?

[No Cents]

a cam compliable to the 408-6...with way less noise and similar results would be the Tman 625.

Ray

[1FSTRK]

a cam compliable to the 408-6...with way less noise and similar results would be the Tman 625.

Ray

Or the 662-1

[No Cents]

 
another good one.

[N-gin]

Those heads like the lift, you should take advantage of that.  The 408 will work well, but they are noisy.  A bit pipe sensitive from what I have seen.   I would use them since you have them, and change later if you don't like the noise. 
If you go another route, consider the Tman 660SM.

I like the midrange of those cams.
Seriously thinking I would rather have a top end cams instead. But that's just me and my mouse 107

[GRam]

Sorry was on holidays, thanks for all the replies/suggestions!
Looking to do it once and for all, so hoping I can make the proper choice first time.
Perhaps shelve the 408's for a Dyna project, and go with a tman grind? I do do a fair amount
of long distance rides, so something on the quieter side would be a bonus for sure..

[Jaycee1964]

a cam compliable to the 408-6...with way less noise and similar results would be the Tman 625.

Ray

Or the 662-1

That would be my choice!   

[FlaHeatWave]

a cam compliable to the 408-6...with way less noise and similar results would be the Tman 625.

Ray

Or the 662-1

Another fan of the T-Man 625s here...

That would be my choice!   

[GRam]

Took the advice of many, and ordered a set of the Tman 625 earlier today.
Neither the tech, nor myself, were overly comfortable with maxing the heads out at .650 with the 408's..
This will leave some fudge factor left over, and from all I've seen, should produce a real nice runner, stoked!
Will post results when I get it all back up and running/tuned. Thanks for all the insight...

[Matt C]

Took the advice of many, and ordered a set of the Tman 625 earlier today.
Neither the tech, nor myself, were overly comfortable with maxing the heads out at .650 with the 408's..
This will leave some fudge factor left over, and from all I've seen, should produce a real nice runner, stoked!
Will post results when I get it all back up and running/tuned. Thanks for all the insight...

I think you're going to like those, allot.

[sfmichael]

Took the advice of many, and ordered a set of the Tman 625 earlier today.
Neither the tech, nor myself, were overly comfortable with maxing the heads out at .650 with the 408's..
This will leave some fudge factor left over, and from all I've seen, should produce a real nice runner, stoked!
Will post results when I get it all back up and running/tuned. Thanks for all the insight...

[GRam]

Yup I'm super excited to get it all buttoned up again 
I'm expecting it to hit harder, earlier, and pack out the big end a bit better, should be a win-win in my books!
Buddy has a 107 that right now steadily pulls away from me, can't have that,
hopefully I've closed the gap  hahaha

[Ohio HD]

I'm running the GMR 577 cams in my 110, 55mm HPI, Headwork, Fatcat, Vision tuner.

Chad, are you running 11:1 with the 577 cams?

http://harleytechtalk.com/htt/index.php/topic,79833.msg889045.html#msg889045

[harleytuner]

I'm running the GMR 577 cams in my 110, 55mm HPI, Headwork, Fatcat, Vision tuner.

Chad, are you running 11:1 with the 577 cams?

http://harleytechtalk.com/htt/index.php/topic,79833.msg889045.html#msg889045

Yes, the only change from the previous build was the cams and TB.  I haven't checked CCP on it with the 577's yet but with the 259E's it with around 225

[Ohio HD]

I'm running the GMR 577 cams in my 110, 55mm HPI, Headwork, Fatcat, Vision tuner.

Chad, are you running 11:1 with the 577 cams?

http://harleytechtalk.com/htt/index.php/topic,79833.msg889045.html#msg889045

Yes, the only change from the previous build was the cams and TB.  I haven't checked CCP on it with the 577's yet but with the 259E's it with around 225

Thanks!   

I've just have been looking over some 110 configurations if / when I need to do something with my Ultra motor. My other bike is a 117, and if I get into the Ultra at some point, I want a fairly conservative torque motor, and have interest in the GMR 577 cams as well.

[Ohio HD]

By the way Chad, very nice chart, and the torque curve is awesome!   

[harleytuner]

By the way Chad, very nice chart, and the torque curve is awesome!   

Thanks, it's fun to ride.  These are my favorite cams in this bike so far.  It only has the AIM lock up and it's slipping below 4K also, so there might be a little more torque in it.  I have a AIM CF2 clutch ordered for a customer, when it gets here i'll decide if i'm getting one for me or not.  It looks like one hell of a nice set up, but at $2100 retail that's a lot of coin.  lol

[C-Cat]

my choice would be Crane 296. They do great in 107's@10.7-10.8 compression. My guess is they will be even better on a 110, especially down low. They just seem to produce better #'s than other cams our local hot rod shop has tried, not to mention cheaper price than Woods, T-Man cams. Someone had a 113 on here using them that made great #'s, around 130 ft. lbs. and they're quiet, pull best  mid to top. A tough one to match IMO.

[ndmp40]

my choice would be Crane 296. They do great in 107's@10.7-10.8 compression. My guess is they will be even better on a 110, especially down low. They just seem to produce better #'s than other cams our local hot rod shop has tried, not to mention cheaper price than Woods, T-Man cams. Someone had a 113 on here using them that made great #'s, around 130 ft. lbs. and they're quiet, pull best  mid to top. A tough one to match IMO.

Yes.  Its a good choice for a hotrod 107.  I have them in my 117 touring motor and they make great power without being the least bit finicky.