May 08, 2024, 03:46:28 AM

News:


110 ci big bore kits for 2007 up

Started by strokerjlk, August 22, 2015, 09:50:25 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

N-gin

Quote from: Carl 1969 on October 16, 2015, 03:04:16 PM
Who makes 4" pistons for 4" stroke? Would it be worthwhile to try to track down some used 110" cylinders & have the spigots turned, vs. buying the "kit" jugs?
Got to ask yourself is it worth the 3-5 more HP/TQ to turn down the 110 siggot, to risk failure.
I certainly see some issues with turning it down thin, but I also see that there might not be an issue.
If I had another bike and some time I'd try it.
I'm not here cause of a path before me, Im here cause of the burnout left behind

motolocopat

Asked this earlier as it is stated or implied that there are concerns of the cylinders distorting... Might have been both :beer: :argue:
   
"From a laymans point of view it seems that the higher strength sleeve for extending into the case would also benefit the upper cylinder area as well and aid in maintaining roundness.. thoughts on this from the experts?

Any with enough real world of  enough decent metallurgical training/experience to have an idea if the stiffer liners might aid in this area of the equation?
MotoLocoPat  2015 FLTRXS, 2013FLHX, 2010FXDF
2006 Ducati S2R1000, 2004 KTM950

Mountainman streetbob

I am surely tempted to do this on my 103 if I could get just the sylinders, cylinders and pistons OR cylinders/pistons/110 or MVA heads AT A DECENT PRICE! Sure seems worth a try...
Brice H Dyal  The "Mountainmman"
US Army 89-01 35H/12B US Army AMC

strokerjlk

Quote from: N-gin on October 16, 2015, 05:56:10 PM
Quote from: Carl 1969 on October 16, 2015, 03:04:16 PM
Who makes 4" pistons for 4" stroke? Would it be worthwhile to try to track down some used 110" cylinders & have the spigots turned, vs. buying the "kit" jugs?
Got to ask yourself is it worth the 3-5 more HP/TQ to turn down the 110 siggot, to risk failure.
I certainly see some issues with turning it down thin, but I also see that there might not be an issue.
If I had another bike and some time I'd try it.
After further review .
I don't think I will be turning down the "stock " cylinders myself .
The price of the stronger cylinders will have to come down before I try them as well.
A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis
repeated testing establishes theory

N-gin

There was a couple of those kits around town put in recently..I'll have to keep my ears peeled.
I wonder how true these spigots are after mass production and shipping?
I'm not here cause of a path before me, Im here cause of the burnout left behind

1FSTRK

Quote from: strokerjlk on October 18, 2015, 05:44:29 AM
Quote from: N-gin on October 16, 2015, 05:56:10 PM
Quote from: Carl 1969 on October 16, 2015, 03:04:16 PM
Who makes 4" pistons for 4" stroke? Would it be worthwhile to try to track down some used 110" cylinders & have the spigots turned, vs. buying the "kit" jugs?
Got to ask yourself is it worth the 3-5 more HP/TQ to turn down the 110 siggot, to risk failure.
I certainly see some issues with turning it down thin, but I also see that there might not be an issue.
If I had another bike and some time I'd try it.
After further review .
I don't think I will be turning down the "stock " cylinders myself .

The price of the stronger cylinders will have to come down before I try them as well.

What changed your mind?
"Never hang on to a mistake just because you spent time or money making it."

strokerjlk

Quote from: 1FSTRK on October 18, 2015, 10:55:36 AM
Quote from: strokerjlk on October 18, 2015, 05:44:29 AM
Quote from: N-gin on October 16, 2015, 05:56:10 PM
Quote from: Carl 1969 on October 16, 2015, 03:04:16 PM
Who makes 4" pistons for 4" stroke? Would it be worthwhile to try to track down some used 110" cylinders & have the spigots turned, vs. buying the "kit" jugs?
Got to ask yourself is it worth the 3-5 more HP/TQ to turn down the 110 siggot, to risk failure.
I certainly see some issues with turning it down thin, but I also see that there might not be an issue.
If I had another bike and some time I'd try it.
After further review .
I don't think I will be turning down the "stock " cylinders myself .

The price of the stronger cylinders will have to come down before I try them as well.

What changed your mind?
Someone I trust ,cracked the spigot on one
A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis
repeated testing establishes theory

Admiral Akbar

Quote from: strokerjlk on October 18, 2015, 03:53:46 PM
Quote from: 1FSTRK on October 18, 2015, 10:55:36 AM
Quote from: strokerjlk on October 18, 2015, 05:44:29 AM
Quote from: N-gin on October 16, 2015, 05:56:10 PM
Quote from: Carl 1969 on October 16, 2015, 03:04:16 PM
Who makes 4" pistons for 4" stroke? Would it be worthwhile to try to track down some used 110" cylinders & have the spigots turned, vs. buying the "kit" jugs?
Got to ask yourself is it worth the 3-5 more HP/TQ to turn down the 110 siggot, to risk failure.
I certainly see some issues with turning it down thin, but I also see that there might not be an issue.
If I had another bike and some time I'd try it.
After further review .
I don't think I will be turning down the "stock " cylinders myself .

The price of the stronger cylinders will have to come down before I try them as well.

What changed your mind?
Someone I trust ,cracked the spigot on one

Must be one of those guys that opens the throttle WFO..

strokerjlk

Quote from: Max Headflow on October 18, 2015, 07:38:50 PM
Quote from: strokerjlk on October 18, 2015, 03:53:46 PM
Quote from: 1FSTRK on October 18, 2015, 10:55:36 AM
Quote from: strokerjlk on October 18, 2015, 05:44:29 AM
Quote from: N-gin on October 16, 2015, 05:56:10 PM
Quote from: Carl 1969 on October 16, 2015, 03:04:16 PM
Who makes 4" pistons for 4" stroke? Would it be worthwhile to try to track down some used 110" cylinders & have the spigots turned, vs. buying the "kit" jugs?
Got to ask yourself is it worth the 3-5 more HP/TQ to turn down the 110 siggot, to risk failure.
I certainly see some issues with turning it down thin, but I also see that there might not be an issue.
If I had another bike and some time I'd try it.
After further review .
I don't think I will be turning down the "stock " cylinders myself .

The price of the stronger cylinders will have to come down before I try them as well.

What changed your mind?
Someone I trust ,cracked the spigot on one

Must be one of those guys that opens the throttle WFO..
:up:
A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis
repeated testing establishes theory

Matt C

Quote from: RXBOB on August 22, 2015, 05:13:47 PM
Wait to MCE gets the mail on these :oops:

107cubers copped it this 110 will surely be in for it, and who ever gets one be sure to do a leak down test and post up :fish:

LMAO!!!

Mountainman streetbob

Quote from: PanHeadRed on August 25, 2015, 01:53:54 PM
:up:

Did some test cutting for GM a few years back, polymers are on the horizon.

No one here would believe what can be done with polymers...

Just think of flexible titanium you can mold to be 10x stiffer than any steel alloy yet lighter and transmitting less vibration.
Brice H Dyal  The "Mountainmman"
US Army 89-01 35H/12B US Army AMC

joe_lyons

I'm thinking about getting a James Madison poly
Powerhouse Cycle & Dyno - Performance is our passion 816-425-4901

BUBBIE

James Madison poly.........??????????

I looked through HTT (search) and found nothing on this Joe.

Maybe Expound a little here please :pop: :nix: :scratch: :fish:

Tks.

signed....BUBBIE
***********************
Quite Often I am Right, so Forgive me when I'm WRONG !!!

FSG


BUBBIE

Might using the Polymers allow SHOOTING Up to 115 CU IN... Strength and Thinner walls needed...  :scratch:

You sure Know your Stuff for a Down Under Guy...

Thanks FSG...

signed....BUBBIE
***********************
Quite Often I am Right, so Forgive me when I'm WRONG !!!

joe_lyons

Doubt it,  my comment was an off the wall one.
Powerhouse Cycle & Dyno - Performance is our passion 816-425-4901