HarleyTechTalk

Quote from: jamn on November 14, 2016, 05:05:39 PM

Quote from: Tommy D on November 14, 2016, 01:20:49 PM

Quote from: jamn on November 14, 2016, 01:14:39 PM
Thanks for all of the input gentlemen.

Which did you chooose ?

I'm torn between the 48 and T100. I considered the 48 before this post but I thought you guys would have other opinions because I am using the TD's.

Is a good idea to do the .030 HG with either of these as well or will that affect their performance?

Is this the Rush headpipe you're running?
http://www.rushracingproducts.com/highoutput.html

& to be clear,,, a 96"r ?

Quote from: jamn on November 14, 2016, 05:05:39 PM

Is a good idea to do the .030 HG with either of these as well or will that affect their performance?

I would not pull the heads just to replace the head gaskets with .030" gaskets. If you are pulling them to do other work, fine.

but a 48H with a 0.030" put it right in the ballpark

Quote from: Tommy D on November 14, 2016, 07:10:02 PM

Quote from: jamn on November 14, 2016, 05:05:39 PM

Quote from: Tommy D on November 14, 2016, 01:20:49 PM

Quote from: jamn on November 14, 2016, 01:14:39 PM
Thanks for all of the input gentlemen.

Which did you chooose ?

I'm torn between the 48 and T100. I considered the 48 before this post but I thought you guys would have other opinions because I am using the TD's.

Is a good idea to do the .030 HG with either of these as well or will that affect their performance?

Is this the Rush headpipe you're running?
http://www.rushracingproducts.com/highoutput.html

& to be clear,,, a 96"r ?

Rush TD with NO crossover. (non HO) And a 103"

Quote from: Frédéric CM on November 15, 2016, 04:03:36 AM
but a 48H with a 0.030" put it right in the ballpark

That's what I did to my 103 and 48 cams!

Quote from: spdrcr on November 15, 2016, 06:19:41 AM

Quote from: Frédéric CM on November 15, 2016, 04:03:36 AM
but a 48H with a 0.030" put it right in the ballpark

That's what I did to my 103 and 48 cams!

Do you have a dyno sheet to see ?

Quote from: Frédéric CM on November 15, 2016, 07:01:34 AM

Quote from: spdrcr on November 15, 2016, 06:19:41 AM

Quote from: Frédéric CM on November 15, 2016, 04:03:36 AM
but a 48H with a 0.030" put it right in the ballpark

That's what I did to my 103 and 48 cams!

Do you have a dyno sheet to see ?

Dyno Section. Page 2. 11 up from the bottom.
"2007 FXDWG 103 with 48's, and Slip-ons"

http://harleytechtalk.com/htt/index.php/topic,90007.0.html

looks good !

Not bad for a Dyna! 

Quote from: Frédéric CM on November 15, 2016, 09:00:46 AM
http://harleytechtalk.com/htt/index.php/topic,90007.0.html

looks good !

"The heads had a ton of carbon build up and flaking powder coat that I cleaned up"

I pulled my heads just for the .030HG for my 37's. When I saw what they looked like I couldn't put them back on like they were. If you don't feel like gettin in too deep just do the cams for now. 

Quote from: spdrcr on November 15, 2016, 08:11:21 AM

Quote from: Frédéric CM on November 15, 2016, 07:01:34 AM

Quote from: spdrcr on November 15, 2016, 06:19:41 AM

Quote from: Frédéric CM on November 15, 2016, 04:03:36 AM
but a 48H with a 0.030" put it right in the ballpark

That's what I did to my 103 and 48 cams!

Do you have a dyno sheet to see ?

Dyno Section. Page 2. 11 up from the bottom.
"2007 FXDWG 103 with 48's, and Slip-ons"

That looks awesome, but I think I'm just going to do the 48 cams this winter. So, the next quest is, what is recommended for the rods and do I do the lifters too?

I used stock push rods because I changed to .030 HG. S&S lifters is what I used.

Quote from: Ohio HD on November 12, 2016, 03:36:22 PM
T-man 555 torqster or Andrews 48's will give great low and mid range.

What about S&S 551's in a touring bike?